Characteristics of the Ponorogo Regency Border Gate (A Study of Visual Semiotics)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32664/mavis.v7i02.1880Keywords:
Characteristics, Gate (Gapura), Semiotics.Abstract
The diversity in the manifestation of gate architecture across the island of Java remains observable to this day. The Javanese people are widely recognized as a culturally rich society that continues to preserve and uphold its traditional values. The varied forms of gate structures are reflected in the differing characteristics of their constituent elements. This diversity is also evident upon entering the Ponorogo region of East Java, where one encounters entrance gates adorned with decorative motifs inspired by Reog, a traditional performing art that serves as a cultural emblem of Ponorogo. This study employs a qualitative approach with a descriptive research design to elaborate on the architectural characteristics of the Ponorogo Regency border gate, and is supported by Roland Barthes’ semiotic theory. Denotatively, the Ponorogo border gate functions as a physical boundary marker between administrative regions and serves as an entry point into the regency. On a connotative level, however, the gate carries symbolic meaning, acting as an architectural representation of regional identity. It also functions as a communicative medium, conveying specific cultural themes such as local philosophies, myths, and belief systems embedded within the community. The ornamental patterns and decorative elements serve as a visual reflection of Ponorogo’s cultural heritage. Therefore, the gate’s design embodies symbolic meanings that transcend its physical and functional form.
References
[1] A. F. Ramadhan, “Kajian Makna Ukiran Ragam Hias pada Gapura Makam Sunan Drajat Sebagai Warisan Budaya Nusantara,” Seminar Nasional Seni dan Desain 2019, no. September, pp. 71–76, 2019.
[2] I. Purnengsih and U. Kholisya, “Representasi Kosmologi Jawa Pada Gapura Kontemporer,” Cakrawala: Jurnal Humaniora Bina …, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 113, 2019.
[3] U. Kholisya, S. Maya, and I. Purnengsih, “Karakteristik Gapura di Kecamatan Kebakkramat Kabupaten Karanganyar Jawa Tengah (Kajian Sosial Budaya dan Ekonomi),” Jurnal Desain, vol. 4, no. 02, p. 100, 2017, doi: 10.30998/jurnaldesain.v4i02.1178.
[4] F. Iswandi, C. Agus, and J. Juwintan, “Representasi Makna pada Istilah Benda dan Bangunan Versi Bahasa Indonesia oleh Pemandu Wisata di Keraton Kasepuhan Cirebon,” Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 265–278, 2022, doi: 10.31571/bahasa.v11i2.4550.
[5] J. K. Kalila et al., “Penggambaran Sifat Manusia dalam Desain Karakter Antropomorfik Game ‘ Night in The Woods ,’” vol. 4, pp. 112–121, 2024.
[6] S. N. Muhadiyatiningsih and S. Fathonah, “Dimensi Estetika dan Identitas Budaya dalam Bangunan Keraton Surakarta,” Fikrah, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 73, 2020, doi: 10.21043/fikrah.v8i1.6525.
[7] H. Muttaqin, D. K. Visual, U. S. Maret, J. Kolonel, and S. No, “Analisis Semiotika Teks pada Arca Loga Lembah Bada,” vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 22–32, 2025.
[8] H. Suwantoro and T. A. Salsabila, “International Journal of Architecture and Urbanism,” Talenta.Usu.Ac.Id, vol. 08, no. 03, pp. 408–420, 2024.
[9] A. Risi and Z. Zulkifli, “Kajian Semiotika Ilustrasi Digital Karya Agung Budi Santoso (Pendekatan Semiotika Roland Barthes),” MAVIS : Jurnal Desain Komunikasi Visual, vol. 4, no. 02, pp. 47–55, 2022, doi: 10.32664/mavis.v4i02.739.
[10] A. Pranoto et al., “ANALISIS VISUAL KARAKTER ‘ JACK THE RIPPER ’ DALAM,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 42–54, 2019.
[11] E. D. Siregar and S. Wulandari, “Kajian Semiotika Charles Sanderspierce: Relasitrikotomi (Ikon,Indeks dan Simbol) dalam Cerpenanak Mercusuar karya Mashdar Zainal,” Titian: Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora, vol. 04, no. 1, pp. 29–41, 2020.
[12] O. Setiawan, “Analisis Elemen Visual dan Akustik Panel Bambu Betung pada Ruang Kerja Kreatif,” vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 91–106, 2025.
[13] F. A. Atthalibi, C. B. Amiuza, and A. M. Ridjal, “Semiotika Arsitektur Masjid Jamik Sumenep-Madura,” Jurnal Mahasiswa Jurusan Arsitektur, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2016.
[14] A. Muktiono, “Exploring the Potential of Architectural Semiotic in Realizing the Smart City Concept,” Neo Journal of economy and social humanities, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 41–46, 2024, doi: 10.56403/nejesh.v3i1.170.
[15] K. Studi, G. Di, K. Lamongan, M. Ulfa, and M. Indradjaja, “PENERAPAN CULTURE SYMBOL GAPURA PADURAKSA BERSAYAP SEBAGAI IDENTITAS KOTA LAMONGAN ,” pp. 174–181, 2015.
[16] F. Hiasa, “Analisis Semiotika Pada Motif Batik Besurek Sebagai Upaya Pelestarian Dan Alternatif Bahan Ajar Bahasa Indonesia,” Jurnal Ilmiah Korpus, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 368–377, 2021.
[17] F. Bahasa et al., “Analisis Semiotika Roland Barthes pada Film ‘ Nanti Kita Cerita Hari Ini ’ ( NKCTHI ) Karya Angga Dwimas Sasongko SelviYani Nur Fahida Program Studi Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Roland Barthes ’ Semiotics Analysis on the Film " Nanti Kita Cerita Hari Ini " ( NKCTHI ) by Angga Dwimas Sasongko,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 33–42, 2021.
[18] V. Siti et al., “BUKU FIVE LITTLE PIGS KARYA AGATHA CHRISTIE,” no. 1, pp. 143–156.
[19] P. Raka and S. Putra, “Analisis Identitas Visual Kembara Angkasa Sebagai Livery Spesial Ulang Tahun ke 74 Maskapai Garuda Indonesia,” vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 89–99, 2024.
[20] U. N. Medan, E. Beriring, B. Ulen, and R. Adat, “Analisis Ornamen Kerawang Gayo pada Rumah Adat Pitu Ruang Kabupaten Aceh Tengah,” vol. 02, pp. 47–54, 2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 MAVIS : Jurnal Desain Komunikasi Visual
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
