Implementation and Analysis of Cloud-Native Approaches to Enhance Scalability and Performance in Dwi Jaya Understel Workshop Information System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32664/j-intech.v13i02.2083Keywords:
Amazon RDS, AWS Lambda, Cloud-Native Architecture, Information, Information System, Monolithic Architecture, Scalability, Serverless Computing, System Performance.Abstract
This study aims to analyze the differences in scalability and performance between a traditional monolithic system hosted on a Virtual Private Server (VPS) and a cloud-native serverless architecture using AWS services for an automotive workshop information system. An experimental method was employed using a post-test only control group design. Performance testing was conducted with K6 as the stress testing tool under a ramp-up load pattern of up to 60 Virtual Users (VU) to simulate peak traffic conditions, while Grafana was used for real-time monitoring and visualization of system metrics.The results indicate that under peak load scenarios, the cloud-native architecture reduced the average response time by 89.1% (from 6.05 seconds to 657.10 milliseconds) and eliminated the error rate completely (from 0.154% to 0%), compared to the monolithic system. Additionally, the throughput improved by 38.2%, demonstrating better responsiveness and stability. These findings confirm that serverless cloud-native systems offer superior scalability and reliability in handling dynamic and high-demand workloads, making them well-suited for public service platforms such as automotive workshop information systems.
References
[1] K. M. H. and M. A. Romli, “Application for Mental Health Consultation with Scheduling Function at the Counseling Guidance of Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta”.
[2] L. Y. J. Lin, D. Xie, J. Huang, and Z. Liao, “A multi-dimensional extensible cloud-native service stack for enterprises”, doi: 10.1186/s13677-022-00366-7.
[3] B. T. H. B. H. Lavenia, W. Hayuhardhika, and N. Putra, “Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Point of Sales untuk Bengkel berbasis Cloud Computing (Studi Kasus: Bengkel Mas Pur Baturaja)”.
[4] D. D. Putra and M. R. P. Putra, “Load Balance Design of Google Cloud Compute Engine VPS with Round Robin Method in PT. Lintas Data Indonesia”, doi: 10.33395/sinkron.v3i2.10064.
[5] G. I. S. A’fa Nafasha, I. Putu, and E. Indrawan, “Analisis Perbandingan Biaya dan Serverless Computing pada Google Cloud Platform”.
[6] Y. C. and R. Bisma, “Studi Perbandingan Performa Aplikasi Web Monolitik dan Microservice Berbasis Apache Kafka”.
[7] G. Blinowski, A. Ojdowska, and A. Przybylek, “Monolithic vs. Microservice Architecture: A Performance and Scalability Evaluation,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 20357–20374, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3152803.
[8] H. S. and W. Hasselbring, “A configurable method for benchmarking scalability of cloud-native applications”, doi: 10.1007/s10664-022-10162-1.
[9] D. N. and H. Mulyono, “Sistem Informasi Manajemen Bengkel Berbasis Web pada Bengkel Ikhsan Jaya Motor”.
[10] V. R. S. R. Rakhman, M. Shadiq, and D. Syaddad, “Implementasi Cloud Native dan Multi Cloud Pada Sistem Operasi Windows Dengan Menggunakan Docker dan Cara Penggunaannya”, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13119907.
[11] S. D. and others, “Cloud-Native Computing: A Survey From the Perspective of Services”, doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2024.3353855.
[12] M. C. A. M. Ștefan, N. R. Rusu, and E. Ovreiu, “Empowering Healthcare: A Comprehensive Guide to Implementing a Robust Medical Information System”, doi: 10.3390/asi7030051.
[13] J. S. Patel, “Cloud-Native Performance Testing: Strategies for Scalability and Reliability in Modern Applications”, doi: 10.37745/ejcsit.2013/vol13n83249.
[14] D. Narsina, “Microservices vs. Monoliths: Comparative Analysis for Scalable Software Architecture Design”, doi: 10.18034/ei.v11i2.734.
[15] M. B. and others, “Migrasi Cloud Native Architecture API Development untuk Memaksimalkan 5G Monetization pada Jaringan AXIATA”.
[16] T. R. T. Bodner, T. Radig, D. Justen, and D. Ritter, “An Empirical Evaluation of Serverless Cloud Infrastructure for Large-Scale Data Processing”.
[17] X. Jia, “The Role and Importance of Software Testing in Software Quality Management”.
[18] S. Eismann et al., “A Review of Serverless Use Cases and their Characteristics,” Jan. 2021, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.11110
[19] M. G. C. F. Fan and A. Jindal, “Microservices vs serverless: A performance comparison on a cloud-native web application”, doi: 10.5220/0009792702040215.
[20] J. M. Menéndez, J. E. L. Gayo, E. R. Canal, and A. E. Fernández, “A comparison between traditional and Serverless technologies in a microservices setting”.
[21] R. A. A. Brasoveanu and M. Moodie, “Textual evidence for the perfunctoriness of independent medical reviews”.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 J-INTECH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
