Model AHP untuk Menentukan Prioritas Tema Kegiatan Keilmuan Berdasarkan Preferensi Mahasiswa

Penulis

  • Muhammad Alif Nur Darwanza Universitas Bhinneka Nusantara
  • Febry Eka Purwiantono febry@ubhinus.ac.id

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32664/elang.v4i1

Kata Kunci:

Analytical Hierarchy Process, Kegiatan Keilmuan, Rekomendasi Tema Workshop, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan, Umpan Balik Peserta

Abstrak

Penentuan tema kegiatan keilmuan di perguruan tinggi umumnya masih bergantung pada pertimbangan subjektif penyelenggara sehingga belum sepenuhnya mencerminkan kebutuhan mahasiswa. Penelitian ini bertujuan membangun model rekomendasi tema workshop menggunakan metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dengan mengintegrasikan preferensi mahasiswa dan pertimbangan akademik program studi. Data penelitian berasal dari 23 kegiatan workshop Universitas Bhinneka Nusantara (UBHINUS) periode 2022– 2025 yang menghasilkan 1.551 respons umpan balik. Setelah proses data cleaning, diperoleh 1.109 respons valid. Melalui proses ekstraksi, satu respons dapat menghasilkan lebih dari satu  usulan  tema  sehingga diperoleh  1.142  tema yang kemudian dikategorikan menggunakan pendekatan rule-based text    classification   berbasis    pencocokan    kata    kunci. Implementasi AHP difokuskan pada studi kasus workshop Laravel Filament Mastery: Creating Dynamic CRUD Interfaces dengan 49 respons umpan balik dan lima alternatif tema workshop yang memiliki frekuensi usulan tertinggi. Tiga kriteria yang digunakan meliputi frekuensi usulan mahasiswa, relevansi kurikulum program studi, dan relevansi profil lulusan.  Hasil  pembobotan  menghasilkan  bobot  kriteria masing-masing sebesar 0,648; 0,230; dan 0,122 dengan nilai Consistency Ratio (CR) sebesar 0,0047 yang menunjukkan penilaian    konsisten.    Hasil    sintesis    prioritas    global menempatkan Artificial Intelligence (AI) sebagai rekomendasi utama dengan skor 30,74%, diikuti General IT/TI sebesar 29,34%, Mobile Development sebesar 16,09%, Desain UI/UX sebesar 15,81%, dan Pemrograman Web sebesar 8%. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa AHP mampu menghasilkan rekomendasi tema kegiatan yang lebih objektif, konsisten, dan selaras dengan kebutuhan mahasiswa serta tujuan akademik program studi.

Referensi

Abd Aziz, K. A., Mohd Idris, M. F. I., Wan Daud, W. S., & Mohamad Fauzi, M. (2023). Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) for the Selection of Best Student Award. UiTM Cawangan Perlis.

Abd Aziz, K. A., Wan Daud, W. S., Mohd Idris, M. F. I., & Saimuddi, S. (2024). Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process for Analysing the Factors that Influence the Career Choices of Graduate Students at UiTM Perlis. Journal of Computing Research and Innovation, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.24191/jcrinn.v9i1.395

Amalia, H., Puspita, A., Faridah, I., Kurniasari, S., & Yuningsih, Y. (2025). Penerapan Metode AHP untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Siswa Teladan. Infotek: Jurnal Informatika Dan Teknologi, 172–180. https://doi.org/10.29408/jit.v8i1.27683

Feng, Z., Hou, H. C., & Lan, H. (2024). Understanding University Students’ Perceptions of Classroom Environment: A Synergistic Approach Integrating Grounded Theory (GT) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Journal of Building Engineering, 83, 108446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108446

Juangjaya, J., Al-Faridzi, S., Pratama, I. A., Ilham, M. F., & Arbansyah. (2024). Penggunaan AHP dalam Menentukan Program Studi Unggulan di Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Informatika Dan Teknologi Pendidikan, 84–94. https://doi.org/10.59395/jitp.v4i2.105

Kusairee, M. A., Nasir, Z. A., Nasir, N. M., Syeddin, S. N., & Salim, N. Z. (2024). Determining the Most Critical Pedagogical Approach for Principle of Economics (ECO120) Through Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Analysis in Higher Education. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 5291–5300. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.803395S

Kusuma, T. P., Lestari, P. V, & Waluyo, R. (2025). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dengan AHP-TOPSIS untuk Rekomendasi Konsentrasi Program Studi. JUSTIN (Jurnal Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi), 431–438.

Loda, A., Rangga, A. R., & Sabawaly, D. R. (2024). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Siswa Terbaik Berbasis Web Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process. Polygon: Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.62383/polygon.v2i6.255

Oxley, E., Nash, H. M., & Weighall, A. R. (2024). Consensus Building Using the Delphi Method in Educational Research: A Case Study with Educational Professionals. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2024.2317851

Öztaysi, B., Onar, S. C., & Kahraman, C. (2023). An Initial Research on Comparison of Fuzzy AHP and Classical AHP Methods. In Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems (INFUS 2023) (Vol. 759). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39777-6_46

Rizaldi, D., & A’yuniah, Q. (2024). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Siswa Berprestasi di MAN 3 Pekanbaru Menggunakan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process. Indonesian Journal of Informatic Research and Software Engineering, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.57152/ijirse.v4i1.1349

Sahin, S. (2024). Utilizing AHP and Conjoint Analysis in Educational Research: Characteristics of a Good Mathematical Problem. Education and Information Technologies, 29(18), 25375–25401.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12830-9

Sumo, D. Z., Zhang, L., & Sumo, P. D. (2023). Career Choice for ICT among Liberian Students: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Study Using Analytical Hierarchy Process. Heliyon, 9(5), e16445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16445

Tavana, M., Soltanifar, M., & Santos-Arteaga, F. J. (2023). Analytical Hierarchy Process: Revolution and Evolution. Annals of Operations Research, 326(2), 879–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04432-2

Wasim, J., Vyas, V., Amenta, P., & others. (2023). Deriving the Weights for Aggregating Judgments in a Multi-Group Problem: An Application to Curriculum Development in Entrepreneurship. Annals of Operations Research, 326, 853–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04649-9

Xu, X., Liu, R., & Serrano, E. D. (2026). An Analytic Hierarchy Process-Based Prioritization of Psychological Factors Influencing Academic Performance among University Students in China. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38343-8

Yu, Y., & Qiu, J. (2022). Construction and Application of the Talent Training System in Colleges and Universities Based on the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 7295875. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7295875

Zhang, L. (2022). Construction of Evaluation Indicator System of College Physical Education Teaching Environment Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process. Advances in Multimedia, 2022, 4148866. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4148866

Diterbitkan

2026-07-31